Coordinating Wickedness: A Comparative Analysis of How Norway and Sweden Organize for Climate Policies

13Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Through the lenses of “wicked policy problems” this article compares how Norway and Sweden organize for climate policies and analyzes the coordination challenges encountered by the two countries. Both countries’ policy fields display characteristics of complexity, divergence, fragmentation and uncertainty, indicating a substantial degree of organizational wickedness. The conditions for dealing with such wickedness is affected by contextual factors such as ministerial rule and the petroleum industry’s pivotal role in Norway, enhancing the role of administrative silos; and Swedish traditions to delegate responsibility in the governance system and prohibition of ministerial rule allows a slightly more unified approach to policies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neby, S., & Zannakis, M. (2020). Coordinating Wickedness: A Comparative Analysis of How Norway and Sweden Organize for Climate Policies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(6), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1821362

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free