The policy consequences of cascade blindness

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One way to reduce waste and to make a system more robust is to allow its components to pool resources. For example, banks might insure each other or share a common capital reserve. Systems whose resources have been pooled in this way are highly prevalent in such diverse domains as finance, infrastructure, health care, emergency response and engineering. However, these systems have a combination of characteristics that leave them vulnerable to poor decision-making: non-linearity of risk; obvious rewards combined with hidden costs; and political and market incentives that encourage inadequate safety margins. Three studies demonstrate a tendency for managers of such systems to underestimate the probability of cascading failures. We describe a series of behaviorally based policy interventions to mitigate the resulting hazards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elga, A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2021). The policy consequences of cascade blindness. Behavioural Public Policy, 5(2), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free