How onesimus was heard – eventually. Some insights from the history of interpretation of paul’s letter to philemon

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although Onesimus is the reason for Paul’s Letter to Philemon, he is only mentioned by name for the first time nearly halfway through the letter (v. 10). He also remains voiceless throughout the letter. This contribution focuses on the history of interpretation of the letter, and, in particular, the way in which the role of Onesimus has been interpreted through the centuries. Several examples of the way in which scholars interpreted the role of Onesimus are discussed, and it is argued that four broad trends may be discerned: Onesimus as a culprit who was saved by Paul; Onesimus as a pawn in the abolitionism debate; Onesimus’ status disputed, and Onesimus as a victim, with the letter being read in a resistant way.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tolmie, D. F. (2019). How onesimus was heard – eventually. Some insights from the history of interpretation of paul’s letter to philemon. Acta Theologica, 2019, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.18820/23099089/actat.Sup27.6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free