Sustainability and Governance in Developing Open Source Projects as Processes of In-Becoming

  • Curto-Millet D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sustainability is often thought of as a binary state: an open source project is either sustain- able or not. In reality, sustainability is much more complex. What makes this project more sustainable than that one? Why should it be assumed in the first place that sustainability is a prolonged state of an ingraced project? The threads are pulled from their yarns in many directions. This article attempts to reconceptualize some assumed notions of the processes involved in developing open source software. It takes the stance in favour of studying the fluctuant nature of open source and the associated artefacts, not as well-defined objects, but as com- mons that are continually built upon, evolved, and modified; sometimes in unexpected ways. Further, the governance of these commons is an ongoing process, tightly linked with the way in which these commons are allowed to further develop. This perspective of "in- becoming" is useful in understanding the efforts and processes that need to be provided to sustainably govern the development of open source projects and the advantages for man- aging requirements derived therein.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Curto-Millet, D. (2013). Sustainability and Governance in Developing Open Source Projects as Processes of In-Becoming. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview649

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free