Trans-Neutrality in Intimate Partner Violence Service Provision in the USA and Canada

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Trans women have distinct dynamics in abusive relationships that cisgender women may not experience (e.g., purposeful misgendering). Therefore, it is important that IPV service providers recognize the unique needs of trans women to provide appropriate care. We draw on data from a larger study employing an online open-ended survey with a hypothetical vignette depicting a trans woman experiencing IPV (Merken et al., 2023). Responses from 75 IPV service providers in the USA and Canada indicate that many respondents aim to “treat everyone equally” regardless of gender identity, but may do so based on the constraints of their organization. Drawing on colorblind racial ideology, we discuss the harms of generalized IPV service provision, or what we term trans-neutrality. We argue this perspective has harmful consequences for trans women seeking assistance and call for more structural support for service providers to implement sustained trans-inclusive IPV provision. Implications for IPV policy and practice are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moton, L. N., Merken, S., Slakoff, D. C., & Aujla, W. (2023). Trans-Neutrality in Intimate Partner Violence Service Provision in the USA and Canada. Critical Criminology, 31(4), 1007–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-024-09748-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free