Abstract
The selection criteria in liver transplantation for HCC are a matter of debate. We reviewed our series, comparing two periods: before and after 1996, when we started to apply the Milan criteria. The study population was composed of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of HCC, confirmed by the pathological report and with a survival of > 1 year. Preoperative staging as revealed by radiological imagining was distinguished from postoperative data, including the variable of tumor volume. After 1996 tumor recurrences significantly decreased (6 out of 15 cases, 40% vs. 3 out of 48, 6.3%, P < .005) and 5-year patient survival improved (42% vs. 83%, P < .005). Not meeting the Milan criteria was significantly related to higher recurrence rate (37.5% vs. 12.7%, P < .05) and to lower 5-year patient survival (38% vs. 78%, P < .005 and P < .05, respectively). The ROC curve showed a linear correlation between preoperative tumor volume and HCC recurrence. Milan criteria significantly reduced tumor recurrences after liver transplantation, improving long-term survival. In conclusion, the efficacy of tumor selection criteria must be analyzed with the use of preoperative data, to avoid bias of the postoperative evaluation. Tumor volume and alfa-fetoprotein level may improve the selection of patients. Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ravaioli, M., Ercolani, G., Cescon, M., Vetrone, G., Voci, C., Grigioni, W. F., … Grazi, G. L. (2004, September). Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Further considerations on selection criteria. Liver Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20239
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.