Outpatient termination of pregnancy: Halothane or alfentanil-supplemented anaesthesia

11Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Inhalation anaesthesia with halothane was compared with i. v. alfentanil in 66 unpremeditated patients undergoing suction termination of pregnancy as outpatients. Blood loss was significantly greater in the halothane group with a mean loss of 213 ml, compared with a mean loss of 89.8 ml in the alfentanil group. There was a greater frequency of nausea and vomiting in the alfentanil group, but no reduction in abdominal pain or need for analgesia after operation. Positive relationships were found between blood loss and duration of anaesthesia and between blood loss and gestational age in the halothane group, but not in the alfentanil group. We conclude that a/fentan/l-supplemented anaesthesia is satisfactory for suction termination of pregnancy when rapid recovery is required or the duration of the procedure is likely to be long, but that halothane anaesthesia cannot be recommended, especially if the procedure is long. © 1985 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Collins, K. M., Plantevin, O. M., Whitburn, R. H., & Doyle, J. P. (1985). Outpatient termination of pregnancy: Halothane or alfentanil-supplemented anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 57(12), 1226–1231. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/57.12.1226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free