Rural adolescent immunization: Delivery practices and barriers to uptake

9Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Rural adolescent vaccination rates lag behind urban. We sought to assess rural-urban differences in barriers to adolescent vaccination, perceived parental vaccine attitudes, and immunization delivery practices among public health nursing (PHN), pediatric (Peds), and family medicine (FM) clinicians. Methods: Internet and mail survey of Colorado PHN, Peds, and FM clinicians from June-August 2019. Study population was recruited from local health plans and the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Rural and urban responses were compared using Cochran Armitage trend, Fisher's exact, and chi-square tests. Results: Response rate was 38% (163/433; 91 rural, 72 urban). Rural respondents were less likely than urban to agree most patients have insurance that covers vaccination (86% vs 97%; P=.02). Rural respondents were less likely than urban to indicate most parents in their practice would agree with statements about vaccine benefits (P=.02) and trust in medical providers (P=.05). Rural respondents were more likely than urban to report adolescents were somewhat/very likely to receive vaccines at public health departments (65% vs 28%; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cataldi, J. R., Brewer, S. E., Perreira, C., Furniss, A., Nederveld, A., Suresh, K., … Dempsey, A. F. (2021). Rural adolescent immunization: Delivery practices and barriers to uptake. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 34(5), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.05.210107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free