An Assessment of Automated Vitamin D Measurement Methods Including a Point-of-Care Testing Method, I-CHROMA™ Using the Randox International Quality Assurance Scheme (Riqas)

  • Bolodeoku J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this review is to firstly assess the performance of commonly used automated Vitamin D measurement methods enrolled in the Randox International Quality Assessment Scheme (RIQAS) against the calculated All Laboratory Trimmed Mean(ALTM), and to secondly evaluate a new point-of-care assay, the Boditech i-CHROMA™ Vitamin D method against the calculated ALTM. The mean estimates of the following vitamin D methods were lower than the ALTM: Abbott Architect, Roche Cobas vitamin D Total, Roche Elecys, Roche Cobas 4000/e411 and Roche Modular, while the mean estimates of the following methods were higher than the ALTM: Siemens Centaur XP/XPT/Classic, Ortho Vitros, and Beckman 600/800.The mean estimates of the following methods were comparable to the ALTM: Diasorin Liaison and IDS SYS. The ALTM of all the automated vitamin D methods in the RIQAS compared very well with all the following methods: Abbott Architect (r2=0.94), Roche Vitamin D Total (r2=0.96), Siemens Centaur XP/XPT/Classic (r2=0.97), Roche Elecys (r2=0.96), Diasorin Liaison (r2=0.84), Roche Cobas 4000/e411 (r2=0.97), IDS SYS (r2=0.86), Roche Modular (r2=0.94) and Beckman 600/800 (r2=0.93) with biases of 4.32, 14.06, -21.62, 14.64, -2.60 and 14.94, -2.18, 12.65 and 1.08nmol/L, respectively. The Ortho Vitro 3600/5600/Eci method correlated very poorly (r2=-0.011). The Beckman 600/800 method had the smallest bias (1.08 nmol/L), followed by the IDS ELISA method with a bias of -2.18nmol/L and the Ortho Vitros method the largest bias. Overall, the laboratory methods with the best combination of a very good correlation (r2> 0.9) and bias (+/- 15% bias difference) with the ALTM were the Beckman 600/800, Abbott Architect, DiaSorin Liaison and IDS ELISA vitamin D methods. The new point of care i-CHROMA™ Boditech Vitamin D method compared well (r2=0.7) with a reasonable bias of -9.97nmol/L compared to the ALTM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolodeoku, J. (2018). An Assessment of Automated Vitamin D Measurement Methods Including a Point-of-Care Testing Method, I-CHROMATM Using the Randox International Quality Assurance Scheme (Riqas). Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2018.03.000937

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free