Relationship between follicular development and the decline in the follicle-stimulating hormone surge in heifers

44Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Experiment 1 was conducted to determine whether progesterone affects the pattern of the FSH surge or follicular development associated with a follicular wave in heifers. On Day 7 (Day 0 = ovulation), heifers were allocated into a group receiving prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF(2α); n = 6) or a control group (n = 5). Twenty-four hours later, all detectable follicles (≥ 2 mm) were ablated (Hour 0). Follicular development was monitored Hours 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 16, at 8-h intervals thereafter until Hour 112. To monitor FSH concentrations, blood was sampled at Hours -24, 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 16, and at 8-h intervals thereafter until Hour 104. There were no differences (p > 0.05) between the PGF(2α)-treated group and controls in the patterns of the FSH surge or follicular development. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that 3-mm follicles do not have FSH-suppressing capacity and that suppression increases as follicles grow beyond 5 mm. Twenty-four hours after an injection of PGF(2α) (Days 6-8), heifers were subjected to either ablation of follicles ≥ 2 mm or ovariectomy. Intact heifers were allocated into four groups (n = 5) in which all follicles of the new wave were ablated upon reaching either 3, 5, or 7 mm or were not ablated (controls). Blood was sampled at 8-h intervals to monitor FSH and estradiol-17β. Averaged over Hours 8-120, FSH concentrations (ng/ml) were higher (p < 0.05) in the ovariectomized (2.02 ± 0.05) and the 3-mm groups (1.91 ± 0.05) than in the 5-mm (1.52 ± 0.05), 7-mm (1.35 ± 0.04), and control groups (1.33 ± 0.05); and estradiol concentrations (pg/ml) were lower (p < 0.05) in the ovariectomized group (0.19 ± 0.03) than in the 3-mm (1.48 ± 0.16), 5-mm (1.56 ± 0.15), 7mm (2.22 ± 0.27), and control groups (2.55 ± 0.49). In conclusion, the presence of endogenous progesterone did not affect FSH patterns or follicular development. Follicles ≤ 3 mm had no detectable capacity to suppress FSH. As follicles grew from 3 to 5 mm, they gained the capacity to suppress FSH; however, as follicles grew beyond 5 mm, FSH- suppressing capacity did not increase. The FSH decline was not attributable to an increase in circulating estradiol.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibbons, J. R., Wiltbank, M. C., & Ginther, O. J. (1999). Relationship between follicular development and the decline in the follicle-stimulating hormone surge in heifers. Biology of Reproduction, 60(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod60.1.72

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free