SELF‐IMPOSED SILENCE: PARENTAL ANTAGONISM AND THE EVOLUTION OF X‐CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION

  • Haig D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A model is proposed for the evolution of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in which natural selection initially favors the silencing of paternally derived alleles of X-linked demand inhibitors. The compensatory upregulation of maternally derived alleles establishes a requirement for monoallelic expression in females. For this reason, XCI is self-reinforcing once established. However, inactivation of a particular X chromosome is not. Random XCI (rXCI) is favored over paternal XCI because rXCI reduces the costs of functional hemizygosity in females. Once present, rXCI favors the evolution of locus-by-locus imprinting of X-linked loci, which creates an evolutionary dynamic in which different chromosomes compete to remain active.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haig, D. (2006). SELF‐IMPOSED SILENCE: PARENTAL ANTAGONISM AND THE EVOLUTION OF X‐CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION. Evolution, 60(3), 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01125.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free