Financial incentives to improve the quality of primary care in the UK: Predicting the consequences of change

35Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Up to 20% of additional income is being provided to UK general practitioners (GPs) to improve quality of care, through a complex set of quality indicators which relate principally to chronic disease management and organizational aspects of care. Using data from semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 20 GPs and responses from 1035 GPs to a questionnaire survey (53% response rate), we describe the initial impact of these incentives. GPs are employing more staff, especially nurses and data entry clerks, and computerizing their clinical records. Patients are more frequently seen in disease-oriented clinics run by nurses. While the health gains associated with the incentives may be realized, GPs predict that there may be unintended consequences, including reduced continuity of care, care fragmentation, neglect of unincen-tivized conditions, and the risk of damage to their internal motivation. © 2006, Arnold. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roland, M., Campbell, S., Bailey, N., Whalley, D., & Sibbald, B. (2006). Financial incentives to improve the quality of primary care in the UK: Predicting the consequences of change. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 7(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1191/1463423606pc272oa

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free