Effectiveness of Mobilisation with Movement Versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Pain and Functions Among Patients with Unilateral Medial Compartment Tibiofemoral Knee Osteoarthritis

  • Sharma R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of Mobilisation with Movement and conventional physiotherapy in patients with unilateral medial compartment tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis. Methods: A total of 30 subjects with osteoarthritis knee diagnosed clinically were included in the study and randomised equally into two groups, 15 in each. Group A had Mobilisation with Movement and Group B underwent conventional physiotherapy.The outcome measures used were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oxford knee score (OKS). The measurement were taken at baseline and after 2 weeks of intervention. Results: The paired and unpaired t tests were used to compare within and between the groups respectively. Both the groups improved in pain and Oxford knee score, but Group A improved significantly more in Visual analogue scale (VAS) (P<0.0001) and Oxford knee score (OKS) (P <0.0405) than Group B. Conclusion: The study concluded that Mobilisation with Movement (MWM) provides superior benefits over conventional physiotherapy in improving the pain and functions. Keywords: Knee Osteoarthritis, Mobilisation with Movement, Shortwave diathermy, VAS, OKS

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharma, R. (2022). Effectiveness of Mobilisation with Movement Versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Pain and Functions Among Patients with Unilateral Medial Compartment Tibiofemoral Knee Osteoarthritis. International Journal of Research and Review, 9(9), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20220927

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free