Abstract
The definition of biological sex has become a renewed focus of societal debate, fuelled by the conflation of biological principles with discussions of human gender diversity. Here, we argue that conceptual clarity critically depends on separating these domains. Drawing on evolutionary theory and empirical evidence, we maintain that biological sex is best defined as a binary classification of male and female reproductive strategies rooted in anisogamy, characterised by the production of two discrete gamete types of different sizes. We stress that gamete size constitutes the ultimate criterion for biological sex and that this definition applies consistently across sexual systems, from separate-sexed species to hermaphrodites, irrespective of variation in karyotype, hormonal profile, somatic phenotype, or behaviour. Further, we emphasise that evolutionary insights offer a coherent explanation for recurring, though not universal, associations between biological sex and patterns of sex-specific selection, sexual dimorphism and parental care. We conclude that the definition of biological sex as a binary classification based on gamete size is a powerful scientific framework compatible with the diversity of sexual phenotypes found in anisogamous organisms and distinct from the concept of human gender.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Janicke, T., Arnqvist, G., Crochet, P. A., David, P., Jarne, P., Lehtonen, J., … Haag, C. R. (2026). Biological Sex Is Binary and Rooted in Anisogamy. Ecology Letters, 29(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70426
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.