Testing the Replicability of a Successful Care Management Program: Results from a Randomized Trial and Likely Explanations for Why Impacts Did Not Replicate

8Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objectives: To test whether a care management program could replicate its success in an earlier trial and determine likely explanations for why it did not. Data Sources/Setting: Medicare claims and nurse contact data for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with chronic illnesses enrolled in the trial in eastern Pennsylvania (N = 483). Study Design: A randomized trial with half of enrollees receiving intensive care management services and half receiving usual care. We developed and tested hypotheses for why impacts declined. Data Extraction: All outcomes and covariates were derived from claims and the nurse contact data. Principal Findings: From 2010 to 2014, the program did not reduce hospitalizations or generate Medicare savings to offset program fees that averaged $260 per beneficiary per month. These estimates are statistically different (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peterson, G. G., Zurovac, J., Brown, R. S., Coburn, K. D., Markovich, P. A., Marcantonio, S. A., … Stepanczuk, C. (2016). Testing the Replicability of a Successful Care Management Program: Results from a Randomized Trial and Likely Explanations for Why Impacts Did Not Replicate. Health Services Research, 51(6), 2115–2139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12595

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free