Comprehensive Characterization of Anti-HLA and Non-HLA Antibodies in Patients on Kidney Transplant Waiting List and Evaluation of Their Impact on Alloimmunization Risk and Dialysis Treatment

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Alloimmunization remains a major obstacle to successful kidney transplantation, mainly due to the formation of anti-HLA antibodies. In recent years, non-HLA antibodies have emerged as additional immunologic factors that can potentially contribute to graft rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and specificity of both anti-HLA and non-HLA antibodies in patients with end-stage renal disease on a waiting list for kidney transplantation. Serum samples from 74 patients were analyzed using complement-dependent cytotoxicity and solid-phase assays. IgG anti-HLA antibodies were identified in 43.2% of participants, while IgG non-HLA antibodies were detected in 91.9%. The most frequent non-HLA antibodies included anti-ENO1 (28.4%), anti-FIBR1 (23.0%) and anti-PRKCZ (23.0%). A significant difference was found between the number of distinct IgG anti-HLA and IgG non-HLA antibody specificities. However, no significant correlation was found between the number of IgG non-HLA antibody specificities and previous alloimmunization events or dialysis treatments. These results suggest that non-HLA antibodies, although often overlooked, can sometimes play a critical role in transplant outcomes. Routine testing for non-HLA antibodies, in addition to mandatory anti-HLA antibody screening and identification, could improve immunologic risk assessment in transplant patients and post-transplant care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mujić Franić, A., Lilić, M., Katalinić, N., & Glavaš-Obrovac, L. (2024). Comprehensive Characterization of Anti-HLA and Non-HLA Antibodies in Patients on Kidney Transplant Waiting List and Evaluation of Their Impact on Alloimmunization Risk and Dialysis Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free