A Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Objective and Self-Assessed Financial Literacy on Stock Investment Return

8Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Till now, comprehensive and quantitatively meaningful analyses of stock market participation outcomes of retail investors have been limited by data sources in developing countries. This article devised a special questionnaire related to stock investment to measure the financial literacy (FL) and stock investment return (SIR) for the subjects with stockownership in China and to theoretically and empirically study the effects of objective FL, self-assessed FL, and their composite FL on SIR. The results of the comparative analysis showed that self-assessed FL has a greater effect on SIR than objective FL, and the effect is mediated by risk preference. In addition, we found that competent and overconfident respondents have higher SIR, while under confident respondents cannot gain from the stock market. We also found that risk preference has a positive mediating effect in the relationship between competence and overconfidence and SIR, and a negative mediating effect in the relationship between under confidence and SIR. We thus concluded that confident investors can gain more stockholding returns via taking more risks regardless of the level of their actual financial knowledge. Our findings would be a meaningful complement to the studies of stock market participation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liao, K., Zhang, Y., Lei, H., Peng, G., & Kong, W. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Objective and Self-Assessed Financial Literacy on Stock Investment Return. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842277

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free