Radiological and scintigraphic evaluation versus stereotaxic biopsy for intracranial hypodense lesions: a comparison study

  • Kutlay M
  • Kaya S
  • Topuz K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: Intracranial hypodense lesions include a wide group of pathologies with different structures and characters. Although the radiological imaging properties of these neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions are similar, treatment modalities for each lesion differs due to histopathological structure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study we have compared the results of radiological and scintigraphic evaluations with the results of stereotaxic biopsies to figure out the diagnostic impact of these non-inasive modalities. 16 patients who admitted to outpatient clinics with headache and/or seizure complaints were included in the study. RESULTS: MR spectroscopic images diagnosed the lesions as accurately as stereotaxic biopsies. CONCLUSION: Although stereotaxic biopsy keeps the label of "gold standard" when establishing a diagnosis for these lesions, modern radiological modalities are quite reliable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kutlay, M., Kaya, S., Topuz, K., Colak, A., Demircan, N., Ungoren, K., & Velioglu, M. (2009). Radiological and scintigraphic evaluation versus stereotaxic biopsy for intracranial hypodense lesions: a comparison study. Turkish Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.2091-09.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free