Accuracy of psychiatric diagnosis performed under indirect supervision

15Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This work aimed at comparing the accuracy of the psychiatric diagnoses made under indirect supervision to the diagnoses obtained through Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). The study was conducted in 3 university services (outpatient, inpatient and emergency). Data from the emergency service were collected 3 years later, after changes in the training process of the medical staff in psychiatric diagnosis. The sensitivity for Major Depression (outpatient 10.0%; inpatients 60.0%, emergency 90.0%) and Schizophrenia (44.4%; 55.0%; 80.0%) improved over time. The reliability was poor in the outpatient service (Kw = 0.18), and at admission to the inpatient service (Kw = 0.38). The diagnosis elaborated in the discharge of the inpatient service (Kw = 0.55) and in the emergency service (Kw = 0.63) was good. Systematic training of supervisors and residents in operational diagnostic criteria increased the accuracy of psychiatric diagnoses elaborated under indirect supervision, although excellent reliability was not achieved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Del-Ben, C. M., Hallak, J. E. C., Sponholz, A., De Azevedo Marques, J. M., Morelo Labate, C., Betioli Contel, J. O., & Zuardi, A. W. (2005). Accuracy of psychiatric diagnosis performed under indirect supervision. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 27(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462005000100013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free