An effective up-sampling approach for breast cancer prediction with imbalanced data: A machine learning model-based comparative analysis

23Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Early detection of breast cancer plays a critical role in successful treatment that saves thousands of lives of patients every year. Despite massive clinical data have been collected and stored by healthcare organizations, only a small portion of the data has been used to support decision-making for treatments. In this study, we proposed an engineered up-sampling method (ENUS) for handling imbalanced data to improve predictive performance of machine learning models. Our experiment results showed that when the ratio of the minority to the majority class is less than 20%, training models with ENUS improved the balanced accuracy 3.74%, sensitivity 8.36% and F1 score 3.83%. Our study also identified that XGBoost Tree (XGBTree) using ENUS achieved the best performance with an average balanced accuracy of 97.47% (min = 93%, max = 100%), sensitivity of 97.88% (min = 89% and max = 100%), and F1 score of 96.20% (min = 89.5%, max = 100%) in the validation dataset. Furthermore, our ensemble algorithm identified Cell_Shape and Nuclei as the most important attributes in predicting breast cancer. The finding re-affirms the previous knowledge of the relationship between Cell_Shape, Nuclei, and the grades of breast cancer using a data-driven approach. Finally, our experiment showed that Random Forest and Neural Network models had the least training time. Our study provided a comprehensive comparison of a wide range of machine learning methods in predicting breast cancer risk. It can be used as a tool for healthcare practitioners to effectively detect and treat breast cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tran, T., Le, U., & Shi, Y. (2022). An effective up-sampling approach for breast cancer prediction with imbalanced data: A machine learning model-based comparative analysis. PLoS ONE, 17(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free