A comparative study of the second-order hydrophobic moments for globular proteins: The consensus scale of hydrophobicity and the CHARMM partial atomic charges

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, the second-order hydrophobic moment for fifteen globular proteins in 150 nonhomologous protein chains was performed in a comparative study involving two sets of hydrophobicity: one selected from the consensus scale and the other derived from the CHARMM partial atomic charges. These proteins were divided into three groups, based on their number of residues (N) and the asphericity (δ). Proteins in Group I were spherical and those in Groups II and III were prolate. The size of the proteins is represented by the mean radius of gyration (R g), which follows the Flory scaling law, R g ∞N vThe mean value of v was 0.35, which is similar to a polymer chain in a poor solvent. The spatial distributions of the second-order moment for each of the proteins, obtained from the two sets of hydrophobicity, were compared using the Pearson correlation coefficient; the results reveal that there is a strong correlation between the two data sets for each protein structure when the CHARMM partial atomic charges, {pipe}qi{pipe}≥ 0.3, assigned for polar atoms, are used. The locations at which these distributions vanish and approach a negative value are at approximately 50% of the percentage of solvent accessibility, indicating that there is a transition point from hydrophobic interior to hydrophilic exterior in the proteins. This may suggest that there is a position for the proteins to determine the residues at exposed sites beyond this range. © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsai, C. F., & Lee, K. J. (2011). A comparative study of the second-order hydrophobic moments for globular proteins: The consensus scale of hydrophobicity and the CHARMM partial atomic charges. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 12(12), 8449–8465. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12128449

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free