Comparative cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in non-hispanic blacks and whites according to 2014 guidelines: A modeling study

6Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND We compared the cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in non-Hispanic blacks and non-Hispanic whites according to 2014 US hypertension treatment guidelines. METHODS The cardiovascular disease (CVD) policy model simulated CVD events, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and treatment costs in 35- to 74-year-old adults with untreated hypertension. CVD incidence, mortality, and risk factor levels were obtained from cohort studies, hospital registries, vital statistics, and national surveys. Stage 1 hypertension was defined as blood pressure 140-149/90-99mm Hg; stage 2 hypertension as ≥150/100mm Hg. Probabilistic input distribution sampling informed 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vasudeva, E., Moise, N., Huang, C., Mason, A., Penko, J., Goldman, L., … Moran, A. E. (2016). Comparative cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in non-hispanic blacks and whites according to 2014 guidelines: A modeling study. American Journal of Hypertension, 29(10), 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpw047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free