The Impact of Flocculation on In Situ and Ex Situ Particle Size Measurements by Laser Diffraction

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Accurate particle size distribution (PSD) measurements of suspended particulate matter (SPM) composed of flocs and aggregates are important to improve understanding of ecological and geomorphological processes, and for environmental engineering applications. PSDs can be measured in situ (in the field) using a submersible sensor, or ex situ (in the laboratory) using samples. The methodological choice is often guided by logistical factors, and the differences in PSDs acquired by in situ and ex situ measurements is of concern. In this study, a laser-diffraction instrument (the LISST-200X) was used to compare in situ and ex situ PSD measurements. Samples measured ex situ were stored for three consecutive weeks and measured each week in a laboratory using different stirrer speeds. We observed that ex situ measurements display a higher D50 (median particle size) than in situ measurements of the same sample (up to 613% larger, 112% on average). Our experiments show that the difference between in situ and ex situ measurements can be explained by flocculation of the riverine sediments during the first week of storage. During the subsequent ex situ measurements, the stirring results in a significantly lower D50. Ex situ measurements are therefore unsuitable for flocculated SPM. This study provides recommendations for optimizing PSD measurements by calculating the measurement times required to obtain robust PSD measurements (exceeding 3 min per sample), which are larger for field samples with coarser particles and wider PSDs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Lange, S. I., Sehgal, D., Martínez-Carreras, N., Waldschläger, K., Bense, V., Hissler, C., & Hoitink, A. J. F. (2024). The Impact of Flocculation on In Situ and Ex Situ Particle Size Measurements by Laser Diffraction. Water Resources Research, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035176

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free