Calculating sample size for studies with expected all-or-none nonadherence and selection bias

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We develop sample size formulas for studies aiming to test mean differences between a treatment and control group when all-or-none nonadherence (noncompliance) and selection bias are expected. Recent work by Fay, Halloran, and Follmann (2007, Biometrics 63, 465-474) addressed the increased variances within groups defined by treatment assignment when nonadherence occurs, compared to the scenario of full adherence, under the assumption of no selection bias. In this article, we extend the authors' approach to allow selection bias in the form of systematic differences in means and variances among latent adherence subgroups. We illustrate the approach by performing sample size calculations to plan clinical trials with and without pilot adherence data. Sample size formulas and tests for normally distributed outcomes are also developed in a Web Appendix that account for uncertainty of estimates from external or internal pilot data. © 2008, The International Biometric Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shardell, M. D., & El-Kamary, S. S. (2009). Calculating sample size for studies with expected all-or-none nonadherence and selection bias. Biometrics, 65(2), 635–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01114.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free