Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: Real-world evidence in U.S. Adults

Abstract

OBJECTIVE A recent study raises concerns that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) are associated with increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We evaluated the association between new use of DPP4i and IBD risk compared with other secondline antihyperglycemics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We implemented an active-comparator, new-user cohort design using two U.S. administrative claims databases for commercially insured (MarketScan) and older adult (Medicare fee-for-service, 20% random sample) patients from January 2007 to December 2016.We identified patients, aged ≥18 years, who initiated DPP4i versus sulfonylureas (SUs) or initiated DPP4i versus thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and were without prior diagnosis, treatment, or procedure for IBD. The primary outcome was incident IBD, defined by IBD diagnosis preceded by colonoscopy and biopsy and followed by IBD treatment. We performed propensity score weighting to control for measured baseline confounding, estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs [95% CI]) using weighted Cox proportional hazards models, and used randomeffects meta-analysis models to pool aHRs across cohorts. RESULTS We identified 895,747 eligible patients initiating DPP4i, SU, or TZD; IBD incidence rates ranged from 11.6 to 32.3/100,000 person-years. Over a median treatment duration of 1.09-1.69 years, DPP4i were not associated with increased IBD risk across comparisons. The pooled aHRs for IBD were 0.82 (95% CI 0.41-1.61) when comparing DPP4i (n 5 161,612) to SU (n 5 310,550) and 0.76 (0.46-1.26) when comparing DPP4i (n 5 205,570) to TZD (n 5 87,543). CONCLUSIONS Our population-based cohort study of U.S. adults with diabetes suggests that shortterm DPP4i treatment does not increase IBD risk.