Sex-disparities in pediatric and young adult patients with psoriasis treated with biologics: differences in adverse events and disease activity

1Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Sex-differences in biological treatment outcomes in adult patients with psoriasis are well known. Potential sex-differences in a real-world cohort of pediatric and young adult patients with psoriasis using biologics were investigated in this study. Methods: Data on pediatric (<18 years) and young adult (≥18 to ≤30 years) patients were obtained from the prospective, daily practice, ChildCAPTURE and BioCAPTURE registries. Drug survival and adverse event rates were compared between sexes. Confounder-corrected linear mixed models were used to compare Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and (Children’s) Dermatology Life Quality Index ((C)DLQI) scores between sexes. Results: We included 117 pediatric (65 females) and 243 young adult (124 females) patients on biologics (753.4 observation years). Young adult males had a significantly higher PASI at biologic initiation compared to females, with the same trend for pediatric patients. A higher adverse event rate was observed in females compared to males in both pediatric and young adult patients. Drug survival, PASI and (C)DLQI course during the first treatment year, were comparable between pediatric and young adult females and males. Conclusion: Awareness on sex-differences (start PASI and adverse event rates) in pediatric and young adult patients with psoriasis is important for timely initiation and adjustment of appropriate treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Gawahiri, M., Barenbrug, L., Bronkhorst, E. M., de Jong, E. M. G. J., van den Reek, J. M. P. A., & Seyger, M. M. B. (2025). Sex-disparities in pediatric and young adult patients with psoriasis treated with biologics: differences in adverse events and disease activity. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2532672

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free