Comparison of different multi-parameters probability density models for wind resources assessment

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accurate wind resource assessment lies on the precise information provided by a probability distribution function (PDF). Therefore, it is an essential prerequisite to find the most appropriate PDF to model the wind speed data at the planning stage. Earlier, researchers have compared several distributions of 1, 2-parameters such as Rayleigh, Gamma, Exponential, Normal family, Weibull distributions, etc. Among these, 2-paramters Weibull distribution was a widely acceptable distribution for wind speed data modeling. However, its comparison with a multi-parameter (3 and 4 parameters) distribution has rarely been studied. In this paper, the Weibull distribution has been compared with four new distributions, which have rarely been studied for wind speed data modeling previously. They are 2-parameter Nakagami and Rician distribution, 4-parameter Johnson SB distribution, and 5-parameter Generalized Hyperbolic distribution. The sites selected for the case study are Trivandrum, Ahmedabad, Calcutta, Jaipur, New Delhi, and Port Blair of India. The result indicates that the Generalized Hyperbolic and Johnson distributions are ranked 1st and 2nd; Weibull and Nakagami distributions perform equally well and are ranked 3rd and 4th among the five compared distributions for five Indian stations. However, for one station (Ahmedabad), which is less skewed and has low kurtosis, the performance of Weibull distribution is better than those of the other distributions. The achieved results reveal that the skewness and kurtosis are equally important as the mean and standard deviation of wind speed data, which may influence the accuracy of the distribution. Wind behavior is stochastic, and a single distribution cannot be accepted as a universally accepted distribution for all locations of India.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gugliani, G. K. (2020). Comparison of different multi-parameters probability density models for wind resources assessment. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0024052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free