PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEWENANGAN KONSTITUSIONAL LEMBAGA NEGARA SEBAGAI SALAH SATU KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

  • Puspitasari S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The problem formulations of this research are: first, how is the structure of state institutions in Indonesian constitutional system according to the 1945 Constitution of Indonesian Republic? Second, what are the issues in dealing with the conflicts related to state institutions' authority in Constitutional Court of Indonesian Republic? This research is aimed at: first, analyzing the structure of state institutions in Indonesian constitutional system according to the 1945 Constitution of Indonesian Republic. Second, analyzing and identifying the issues in dealing with any conflicts related to state institutions' authority in Constitutional Court of Indonesian Republic. This research was a normative legal research. The data analysis was done by using descriptive-qualitative approach. The findings show that: first, the structure of state institutions in Indonesian constitutional system after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesian Republic has equal positions since the position of MPR (People's Consultative Assembly) as the highest state institution has been abolished.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Puspitasari, S. H. (2014). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEWENANGAN KONSTITUSIONAL LEMBAGA NEGARA SEBAGAI SALAH SATU KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 21(3), 402–425. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss3.art4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free