Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics

68Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

If such a thing as nanoethics is possible, it can only develop by confronting the great questions of moral philosophy, thus avoiding the pitfalls so common to regional ethics. We identify and analyze some of these pitfalls: the restriction of ethics to prudence understood as rational risk management; the reduction of ethics to cost/benefit analysis; the confusion of technique with technology and of human nature with the human condition. Once these points have been clarified, it is possible to take up some weighty philosophical and metaphysical questions which are not new, but which need to be raised anew with respect to nanotechnologies: the artificialization of nature; the question of limits; the role of religion; the finiteness of the human condition as something with a beginning and an end; the relationship between knowledge and know-how; the foundations of ethics. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dupuy, J. P. (2007). Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. In Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (Vol. 32, pp. 237–261). https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310701396992

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free