Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: What does brain imaging research mean to clinicians?

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To discuss among neuroscientists and community speech-language pathologists what brain imaging research means to clinicians. Method: Two university neuroscientists and two speech-language pathologists in private practice discussed the matter. Written conversational turns in an exchange were limited to 100 words each. When that written dialogue was concluded, each participant provided 200 words of final reflection about the matter. Result: For now, neuroscience treatments are not available for clinicians to use. But sometime in the future, a critical mass of neuroscientists will likely produce such treatments. The neuroscientists expressed diverse views about the methods that might be used for that to occur. Conclusion: Neuroscience does have practical clinical application at present and, in a way, that does not exclude a concurrent influence of the social model of disability. As such, the current practices of clinicians are supported by basic neuroscience research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, S. E., Jackson, E. S., Santayana, G., Zavos, G., & Onslow, M. (2025). Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: What does brain imaging research mean to clinicians? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2327472

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free