Evaluation of a mobile phone–based intervention to increase parents’ knowledge about the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination and their psychological empowerment: Mixed-method approach

18Citations
Citations of this article
122Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There is mixed evidence on the effectiveness of vaccination-related interventions. A major limitation of most intervention studies is that they do not apply randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the method that, over the last 2 decades, has increasingly been considered as the only method to provide proof of the effectiveness of an intervention and, consequently, as the most important instrument in deciding whether to adopt an intervention or not. This study, however, holds that methods other than RCTs also can produce meaningful results. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 mobile phone–based interventions aimed at increasing parents’ knowledge of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination (through elements of gamification) and their psychological empowerment (through the use of narratives), respectively. The 2 interventions were part of an RCT. Methods: We conducted 2 studies with the RCT participants: a Web-based survey aimed at assessing their rating of the tool regarding a number of qualities such as usability and usefulness (N=140), and qualitative telephonic interviews to explore participants’ experiences with the app (N=60). Results: The results of the survey showed that participants receiving the knowledge intervention (alone or together with the empowerment intervention) liked the app significantly better compared with the group that only received the empowerment intervention (F2,137=15.335; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fadda, M., Galimberti, E., Fiordelli, M., & Schulz, P. J. (2018). Evaluation of a mobile phone–based intervention to increase parents’ knowledge about the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination and their psychological empowerment: Mixed-method approach. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free