Hybrid Judicial Career Structures

  • Garoupa N
  • Ginsburg T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A BS T R AC T Scholars have distinguished career from recognition judiciaries, largely arguing that they reflect different legal cultures and traditions. We start by noting that the career/recog-nition distinction does not correspond perfectly to the civil law/common law distinction, but rather that there are pockets of each institutional structure within regimes that are dominated by the other type. We discuss the causes and implications of this phenomenon , arguing that institutional structure is better explained through a theory of judicial reputation/legitimacy than through a theory of legal origin or tradition. We provide some preliminary empirical support for our account.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garoupa, N., & Ginsburg, T. (2011). Hybrid Judicial Career Structures. Journal of Legal Analysis, 3(2), 411–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lar004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free