Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study

19Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Community Health Workers (CHWs) have a crucial role in improving health in their communities and their role is being expanded in many parts of the world. However, the effectiveness of CHWs is limited by poor training and the education of CHWs has received little scientific attention. Methods Our study was carried out in two districts of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We developed and piloted an inexpensive (two day) training intervention covering national government priorities: HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted disease and Tuberculosis; and Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. Sixty-four CHWs consented to participate in the main study which measured knowledge gains using a modified Solomon design of four different testing schedules to distinguish between the effects of the intervention, testing and any interaction between intervention and testing. We also measured confidence, satisfaction and costs. Results Following the training intervention, improvements in knowledge scores were seen across topics and across districts. These changes in knowledge were statistically significant (p<0.001) and of large magnitude (over 45 percentage points or four standard deviations). However, the CHWs assigned to the test-test-train schedule in one district showed high gains in knowledge prior to receiving the training. All CHWs reported high levels of satisfaction with the training and marked improvements in their confidence in advising clients. The training cost around US$48 per CHW per day and has the potential to be cost-effective if the large gains in knowledge are translated into improved field-based performance and thus health outcomes. Conclusion Training CHWs can result in large improvements in knowledge with a short intervention. However, improvements seen in other studies could be due to test 'reactivity'. Further work is needed to measure the generalisability of our results, retention of knowledge and the extent to which improved knowledge is translated into improved practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Plowright, A., Taylor, C., Davies, D., Sartori, J., Hundt, G. L., & Lilford, R. J. (2018). Formative evaluation of a training intervention for community health workers in South Africa: A before and after study. PLoS ONE, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free