Comparison of Complication and Readmission Rates Between Robot-Assisted and Open Radical Cystectomy: Results From the Randomized RAZOR Clinical Trial

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed differences in complications and readmissions between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC). Materials and Methods: This study uses data from the per-protocol population of the Randomized Robotic-Assisted vs Open Radical Cystectomy (RAZOR) study, a multicenter, open-label, phase 3, noninferiority clinical trial. RAZOR enrolled across 15 academic medical centers in the United States between 2011 and 2014. The median follow-up was 2 years. Complications up to 90 days using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and readmissions at 90 days and 1 year postoperatively were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine any predictors of major complications and of postsurgery readmission. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar, and there was no significant difference in overall and major complication rates between RARC (n = 150) and ORC (n = 152) arms. Simplified frailty index ≥ 3 (HR, 4.22, 95% CI, 2.67-6.66, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Venkatramani, V., Reis, I. M., Gonzalgo, M. L., Swain, S., Svatek, R. S., Parekh, D. J., … Thompson, I. M. (2025). Comparison of Complication and Readmission Rates Between Robot-Assisted and Open Radical Cystectomy: Results From the Randomized RAZOR Clinical Trial. Journal of Urology, 213(6), 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004497

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free