On comparison of stochastic reserving methods with bootstrapping

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We consider the well-known stochastic reserve estimation methods on the basis of generalized linear models, such as the (over-dispersed) Poisson model, the gamma model and the log-normal model. For the likely variability of the claims reserve, bootstrap method is considered. In the bootstrapping framework, we discuss the choice of residuals, namely the Pearson residuals, the deviance residuals and the Anscombe residuals. In addition, several possible residual adjustments are discussed and compared in a case study. We carry out a practical implementation and comparison of methods using real-life insurance data to estimate reserves and their prediction errors. We propose to consider proper scoring rules for model validation, and the assessments will be drawn from an extensive case study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tee, L., Käärik, M., & Viin, R. (2017). On comparison of stochastic reserving methods with bootstrapping. Risks, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks5010002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free