The politics of dependency estimates: Social security board statistics, 1935-1939

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

State theorists maintain that Social Security Board (SSB) bureaucrats managed the evolution of public welfare. Institutional politics theory more readily accepts the influence of political interest groups. SSB archival records offer an opportunity to contrast these models and explore the early measurement of old age dependency. In reports designed to protect the 1935 Social Security Act, SSB staff exaggerated the extent of dependency among elderly persons. By 1939, Board statistics clearly showed that children were more impoverished than aged persons. SSB leadership did not repudiate prior estimates and they accepted rising transfers to aged persons, largely because of the political power of interest groups interested in fiat pensions. While bureaucrats attempted to control events, an institutional politics approach better explains both the pivotal role of other, political actors and the solidification of the myth of old age impoverishment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gratton, B. (1997). The politics of dependency estimates: Social security board statistics, 1935-1939. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/52B.3.S117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free