Is This a Paraphrase? What Kind? Paraphrase Boundaries and Typology

  • Vila M
  • Martí M
  • Rodríguez H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A precise and commonly accepted definition of paraphrasing does not exist. This is one of the rea-sons that have prevented computational linguistics from a real success when dealing with this phenomenon in its systems and applications. With the aim of helping to overcome this difficulty, in this article, new insights on paraphrase characterization are provided. We first overview what has been said on paraphrasing from linguistics and the new lights shed on the phenomenon from computational linguistics. Under the light of the shortcomings observed, the paraphrase pheno-menon is studied from two different perspectives. On the one hand, insights on paraphrase boun-daries are set out analyzing paraphrase borderline cases and the interaction of paraphrasing with related linguistic phenomena. On the other hand, a new paraphrase typology is presented. It goes beyond a simple list of types and is embedded in a linguistically-based hierarchical structure. This typology has been empirically validated through corpus annotation and its application in the pla-giarism-detection domain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vila, M., Martí, M. A., & Rodríguez, H. (2014). Is This a Paraphrase? What Kind? Paraphrase Boundaries and Typology. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 04(01), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2014.41016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free