Strategy Selection, Surrogation, and Strategic Performance Measurement Systems

40Citations
Citations of this article
224Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Strategic performance measurement systems operationalize firm strategy with a set of performance measures. A consequence of such alignment is the tendency for managers to lose sight of the strategic construct(s) the measures are intended to represent, and subsequently act as though the measures are the constructs of interest, a phenomenon referred to as surrogation. We investigate how involvement in strategy selection affects managers' propensity to exhibit surrogation. We predict and find that strategy selection reduces surrogation. Surprisingly, we do not find that engaging in strategy deliberation, a key process underlying strategy selection, reduces surrogation. Thus, managers' involvement in the actual choice of strategy appears to be both a necessary and sufficient condition to mitigate surrogation. Our paper broadens understanding of factors that influence surrogation, such as the effects of different aspects of managers' strategic involvement and buy-in. Further, by documenting how managers behave within (as opposed to simply with) strategic performance measurement systems, we highlight the potential for managers to endogenously influence the effectiveness of such systems. ©, University of Chicago on behalf of the Accounting Research Center, 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, J., Hecht, G. W., & Tayler, W. B. (2013). Strategy Selection, Surrogation, and Strategic Performance Measurement Systems. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00465.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free