Identical fracture patterns in combat vehicle blast injuries due to improvised explosive devices; a case series

7Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In November 2008, a surgical team from the Red Cross Hospital Beverwijk, the Netherlands, was deployed in Afghanistan for three months to attend in the army hospital of Kandahar.During their stay, four incidents of armored personnel carriers encountering an improvised explosive device were assessed. In each incident, two soldiers were involved, whose injuries were strikingly similar.Case presentation: The described cases comprise paired thoracic vertebral fractures, radial neck fractures, calcaneal fractures and talar fractures. Moreover, the different types of blast injury are mentioned and related to the injuries described in our series. Acknowledging the different blast mechanisms is important for understanding possible injury patterns.Conclusion: From this case series, as well as the existing literature on injury patterns caused by blast injuries, it seems appropriate to pay extra attention to bodily areas that were injured in other occupants of the same vehicle. Obviously, the additional surveillance for specific injuries should be complementary to the regular trauma work-up (e.g., ATLS). © 2012 Commandeur et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Commandeur, J., Derksen, R. J., MacDonald, D., & Breederveld, R. (2012). Identical fracture patterns in combat vehicle blast injuries due to improvised explosive devices; a case series. BMC Emergency Medicine, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-12-12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free