Six Month Clinical Evaluation of Prolonged Solvent Evaporation of Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of prolonged solvent evaporation on the clinical performance of universal adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Materials and Methods: A total of 148 NCCLs were randomly placed in 28 subjects according to: SUP5 (Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive [ethanol-water] evaporated for 5 s); SUP25 (SUP evaporated for 25 s); GBU5 (Gluma Bond Universal adhesive [acetone-water] evaporated for 5 s); GBU25 (GBU evaporated for 25 s). Restorations were evaluated at baseline and 6 months, using the updated FDI criteria. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed (α = 0.05). Results: The recall rate was 100% at 6 months. The retention rates were 83.4% for SUP5, 97.3% for SUP25, 100% for GBU5, and 97.3% for GBU25. A significantly lower retention rate was observed for SUP5 compared to GBU5 (p = 0.04). No significant differences among the groups were observed when secondary parameters were evaluated (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Prolonged solvent evaporation time, whether for ethanol-water or acetone-water based universal adhesives, did not improve their clinical performance in NCCLs after 6 months. However, the lowest retention rate was observed in the ethanol-water adhesive when evaporated for only 5 s. Clinical Significance: Extended solvent evaporation time for universal adhesives does not significantly affect their short-term clinical performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gutiérrez, M. F., Cavagnaro, S., León, A., Aliaga-Gálvez, R., Saavedra, R., & Loguercio, A. D. (2025). Six Month Clinical Evaluation of Prolonged Solvent Evaporation of Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 37(12), 2555–2567. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free