AI-assisted grading and personalized feedback in large political science classes: Results from randomized controlled trials

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Grading and providing personalized feedback on short-answer questions is time consuming. Professional incentives often push instructors to rely on multiple-choice assessments instead, reducing opportunities for students to develop critical thinking skills. Using large-language-model (LLM) assistance, we augment the productivity of instructors grading short-answer questions in large classes. Through a randomized controlled trial across four undergraduate courses and almost 300 students in 2023/2024, we assess the effectiveness of AI-assisted grading and feedback in comparison to human grading. Our results demonstrate that AI-assisted grading can mimic what an instructor would do in a small class.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heinrich, T., Baily, S., Chen, K. W., DeOliveira, J., Park, S., & Wang, N. C. H. (2025). AI-assisted grading and personalized feedback in large political science classes: Results from randomized controlled trials. PLOS ONE, 20(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free