Intravascular Lithotripsy as a Novel Treatment Method for Calcified Unprotected Left Main Diseases—Comparison to Rotational Atherectomy—Short-Term Outcomes

24Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The unprotected calcified Left Main disease represents a high-risk subset for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and it is associated with a higher number of periprocedural complications and an increased rate of in-stent thrombosis and restenosis. Adequate lesion preparation plays a crucial role in achieving a favorable PCI outcome. Rotational Atherectomy (RA) is a well-established plaque-modifying method; nevertheless, the data regarding the effectiveness of RA in LM diseases is scarce. Recently, the novel ShockWave-Intravascular-Lithotripsy(S-IVL) device has been introduced to the PCI armamentarium in order to modify the calcified plaque. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 44 consecutive subjects who underwent the LM-PCI, and who were supported by either the RA or S-IVL. Results: The Rota group consisted of 29 patients with a mean syntax score of 28.0 ± 7.5. The S-IVL group was composed of 15 subjects with a syntax score of 23.3 ± 13.0 There were no statistical differences regarding MACE between the RA and Shockwave arms of the in-hospital group (10.3% vs. 6.7%), or in the six month (17.2% vs. 13.3%) follow-up group. Conclusions: RA and S-IVL could be safe and effective therapeutic strategies for calcified LM disease. Further studies with a higher number of participants and longer follow-up times are warranted to establish the potential benefits of RA and S-IVL for the management of LM stenosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rola, P., Kulczycki, J. J., Włodarczak, A., Barycki, M., Włodarczak, S., Szudrowicz, M., … Doroszko, A. (2022). Intravascular Lithotripsy as a Novel Treatment Method for Calcified Unprotected Left Main Diseases—Comparison to Rotational Atherectomy—Short-Term Outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free