Multi-objective topology optimisation for acoustic porous materials using gradient-based, gradient-free, and hybrid strategies

  • Ramamoorthy V
  • Özcan E
  • Parkes A
  • et al.
11Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When designing passive sound-attenuation structures, one of the challenging problems that arise is optimally distributing acoustic porous materials within a design region so as to maximise sound absorption while minimising material usage. To identify efficient optimisation strategies for this multi-objective problem, several gradient, non-gradient, and hybrid topology optimisation strategies are compared. For gradient approaches, the solid-isotropic-material-with-penalisation method and a gradient-based constructive heuristic are considered. For gradient-free approaches, hill climbing with a weighted-sum scalarisation and a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II are considered. Optimisation trials are conducted on seven benchmark problems involving rectangular design domains in impedance tubes subject to normal-incidence sound loads. The results indicate that while gradient methods can provide quick convergence with high-quality solutions, often gradient-free strategies are able to find improvements in specific regions of the Pareto front. Two hybrid approaches are proposed, combining a gradient method for initiation and a non-gradient method for local improvements. An effective Pareto-slope-based weighted-sum hill climbing is introduced for local improvement. Results reveal that for a given computational budget, the hybrid methods can consistently outperform the parent gradient or non-gradient method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramamoorthy, V. T., Özcan, E., Parkes, A. J., Jaouen, L., & Bécot, F.-X. (2023). Multi-objective topology optimisation for acoustic porous materials using gradient-based, gradient-free, and hybrid strategies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(5), 2945–2955. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0019455

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free