Tracheostomy and personal protective equipment (PPE) in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic

8Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The primary aim was to review the guidelines published by Otolaryngology Societies for performing tracheostomies in the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary aim was to briefly review the literature for the effectiveness of surgical masks, N-95 and FFP-3 respirators, and power air purifying respirators (PAPRs) in reducing transmission of respiratory viral infections to health care workers while performing tracheostomy. Recommendations are mainly derived from clinical case series/retrospective observational studies from the SARS 2003/2004 outbreaks or experimental evidence for effectiveness for N-95/FFP-3 respirators and PAPRs. Differences do occur due to lack of evidence for COVID-19 as to whether N-95 and FFP-3 respirators are sufficient, or PAPRs should be recommended for tracheostomy. We would recommend adopting a conservative (protective) approach for HCWs teams performing tracheostomies, by routinely utilizing additional PPE such as PAPRs. Recommendations for the timing of tracheostomy also varied, however, almost all recommend a period of delay. The optimum duration of which is still unclear.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faris, C., Deben, K., van Haesendonck, G., van Laer, C., Puxeddu, R., Verbruggen, K., … Vanderveken, O. M. (2020). Tracheostomy and personal protective equipment (PPE) in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. B-ENT. Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor ORL Gelaat en Halschirugie. https://doi.org/10.5152/B-ENT.2020.20128

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free