Evaluation of single root canals filled using the lateral compaction, tagger's hybrid, microseal and guttaflow techniques

18Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of voids, gutta-percha and root canal sealer using 4 different filling techniques. Fifty-two extracted maxillary lateral incisors were prepared using the crown-down pressureless technique. The teeth were randomly divided in 4 groups (n=13): Lateral compaction (LC), Tagger's hybrid (TH), MicroSeal (MS) and GuttaFlow (GF) techniques. Horizontal cross-sections were made at the 2, 10 and 15 mm levels from the apex. Digital images of the root canal areas were acquired using a stereomicroscope and examined using the Image Tool 3.0 software. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05). In general, a significant decrease in the gutta-percha filled area and increase of sealer area were observed at the apical level for all the evaluated techniques (p<0.05). With regard to the presence of voids, no significant difference was found. MS and TH techniques showed a larger gutta-percha filled area than LC and GF techniques at the coronal and middle third level (p<0.05). From the results of the present study, it may be concluded that the gutta-percha filled area of fillings decrease at the apical level, regardless of the filling technique used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marciano, M. A., Bramante, C. M., Duarte, M. A. H., Delgado, R. J. R., Ordinola-Zapata, R., & Garcia, R. B. (2010). Evaluation of single root canals filled using the lateral compaction, tagger’s hybrid, microseal and guttaflow techniques. Brazilian Dental Journal, 21(5), 411–415. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402010000500006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free