A simple pre‐operative nuclear classification score (Sponcs) for grading cataract hardness in clinical studies

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a simplified pre‐operative nuclear classification score (SPONCS) was valid, both for clinical trials and real‐world settings. Methods: Cataract classification was based on posterior nuclear color: 0 (clear), 1 (subcapsular/posterior cataract with clear nucleus), 2 (mild “green nucleus” with plus sign for yellow reflection of the posterior cortex), 3 (medium “yellow nucleus” with plus sign for brown/red posterior cortex reflection), 4 (advanced with 4 being “red/brown nucleus” and 4+ white nucleus), and 5 (hypermature/Morgagnian nucleus). Inter‐ and intra‐observer validity was assessed by 30 Ophthalmologists for 15 cataract cases. The reliability of the cataract grading score in a surgical setting was evaluated. Correlation of nuclear scores was compared with phacoemulsification cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) in 596 patients. Results: Analysis of mean intra‐observer Cohen kappa agreement was 0.55 with an inter‐observer score of 0.54 for the first assessment and 0.49 for the repeat assessment one week later. When evaluating results by nuclear color alone, there was a substantial agreement for both the intra‐observer (0.70) and inter‐observer parameters: 0.70 for the first test, and 0.66 on repetition with randomization of the cases after a week. CDE levels were found to be significantly different between all SPONCS score groups (p < 0.001), with a lower CDE related to a lower SPONCS score. A strong correlation was found between the SPONCS score and CDE (Spearman′s rho = 0.8, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This method of grading cataract hardness is both simple and repeatable. This system can be easily incorporated in randomized controlled trials to lower bias and confounding effects regarding nuclear density along with application in the clinical setting.