Quantitative laboratory results: Normal or lognormal distribution?

11Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The identification of a suitable distribution model is a prerequisite for the parametric estimation of reference intervals and other statistical laboratory tasks. Classification of normal vs. lognormal distributions from healthy populations is easy, but from mixed populations, containing unknown proportions of abnormal results, it is challenging. We demonstrate that Bowley's skewness coefficient differentiates between normal and lognormal distributions. This classifier is robust and easy to calculate from the quartiles Q1-Q3 according to the formula (Q1-2 · Q2 + Q3)/(Q3-Q1). We validate our algorithm with a more complex procedure, which optimizes the exponent λ of a power transformation. As a practical application, we show that Bowley's skewness coefficient is suited selecting the adequate distribution model for the estimation of reference limits according to a recent International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) recommendation, especially if the data is right-skewed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klawonn, F., Hoffmann, G., & Orth, M. (2020). Quantitative laboratory results: Normal or lognormal distribution? Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 44(3), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2020-0005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free