Comparison of 2 assays for diagnosing rotavirus and evaluating vaccine effectiveness in children with gastroenteritis

51Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We compared rotavirus detection rates in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and in healthy controls using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and semiquantitative realtime reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). We calculated rotavirus vaccine effectiveness using different laboratorybased case definitions to determine which best identified the proportion of disease that was vaccine preventable. Of 648 AGE patients, 158 (24%) were EIA positive, and 157 were also qRT-PCR positive. An additional 65 (10%) were qRT-PCR positive but EIA negative. Of 500 healthy controls, 1 was EIA positive and 24 (5%) were qRT-PCR positive. Rotavirus vaccine was highly effective (84% [95% CI 71%-91%]) in EIA-positive children but offered no significant protection (14% [95% CI -105% to 64%]) in EIAnegative children for whom virus was detected by qRT-PCR alone. Children with rotavirus detected by qRT-PCR but not by EIA were not protected by vaccination, suggesting that rotavirus detected by qRT-PCR alone might not be causally associated with AGE in all patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tate, J. E., Mijatovic-Rustempasic, S., Tam, K. I., Lyde, F. C., Payne, D. C., Szilagyi, P., … Parashar, U. D. (2013). Comparison of 2 assays for diagnosing rotavirus and evaluating vaccine effectiveness in children with gastroenteritis. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 19(8), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1908.130461

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free