Impact of Land‐Use History and Forest Trees on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks

  • Kolbe S
  • Miller A
  • Townsend-Small A
  • et al.
7Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Reforestation and afforestation of agricultural land can lead toincreased storage of C and N. Few studies have determined the effect ofreforestation on N compared with C accumulation or the impact of forestcommunity structure on soil organic C (SOC) and N stocks. We selected achronosequence of six forested study sites to investigate whether SOCand N were affected by land-use history or forest community structure.We took soil cores at depths of 15 to 35 cm from eight plots at eachstudy site, measured SOC and N concentrations, SOC/N ratios, the minimumtime since partial and full reforestation, and tree composition andstructure. The SOC and N concentrations increased with time sincepartial and full reforestation in shallow soils (top 10 cm; p < 0.01)but less so in deeper soils (10-20 cm; p > 0.05; rocky soil limitedanalyses below 20 cm). The SOC and N concentrations were more closelylinked to the onset of reforestation. The SOC/N ratio increased withtime since partial and full reforestation in deeper soils (p < 0.01) butnot in shallow soils (p > 0.05). There was no relationship betweeneither SOC or N and forest composition or structure (p > 0.05). Ourresults demonstrate that the onset of reforestation is a key factorcontrolling SOC and N concentrations, which increased from partial tofull reforestation, particularly in shallow soils. The more pronouncedincrease in the SOC/N ratio in deeper soils reflected an accumulation ofSOC with time in these soils, while N content remained comparativelystable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kolbe, S. E., Miller, A. I., Townsend-Small, A., Cameron, G. N., & Culley, T. M. (2016). Impact of Land‐Use History and Forest Trees on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 80(4), 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.12.0426

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free