Poor pregnancy outcome following assisted reproductive technology among women operated on for bilateral endometriomas

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the first line of infertility treatment for managing patients with unilateral or bilateral ovarian endometriomas. Methods: We evaluated pregnancy outcome in patients who had received ovarian surgery for unilateral (Group U, n = 47) or bilateral endometriomas (Group B, n = 38) and aspiration with or without alcohol fixation for unilateral (Group u, n = 37) or bilateral endometriomas (Group b, n = 22). Subsequently, 64 of these women, excluding 29 dropouts, underwent assisted reproductive technology. We compared the clinical pregnancy rates of the four groups. Results: The cumulative pregnancy rate after operation of Group B (18%) was significantly lower than that of a cyst-free control group (n = 143; 44%) and Group U (43%). Group B had fewer oocytes fertilized during ART than did Group b (P < 0.005) and fewer blastocysts available for transfer (P < 0.005). The cumulative pregnancy rate of Group B was also lower than in Group b (P = 0.052). Conclusions: Pregnancy outcomes of Group B were not better than for Group b. Therefore, encouraging such women to move directly to ART might help avoid ovarian damage and improve their ability to achieve a pregnancy. © 2009 Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamamoto, S., Umeki, M., Maeda, T., Yamaguchi, M., & Hamano, T. (2010). Poor pregnancy outcome following assisted reproductive technology among women operated on for bilateral endometriomas. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 9(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-009-0039-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free